Societal Cohesion Problems

The Diverging Paths of AI Usage

Imagine two people living in the same society, with access to the same technology, yet making vastly different choices in how they spend their time:

  1. Person A:
    • Spends hours each day scrolling through TikTok, consuming algorithmically optimized entertainment that requires little thought or engagement.
    • Passively absorbs content without reflection, resulting in a gradual erosion of critical thinking and intellectual curiosity.
    • Over 12, 24, or 36 months, their worldview narrows, their skills stagnate, and their sense of purpose diminishes.
  2. Person B:
    • Dedicates the same hours to learning and experimenting with AI—strategizing, solving problems, and building new skills, like coding in Python or launching a small business.
    • Engages in continuous self-improvement and exploration, using AI as a partner to accelerate their growth.
    • Over the same timeframe, they develop new expertise, opportunities, and confidence, creating a trajectory that’s fundamentally different from Person A’s.

Compounding Divergence Over Time

The compounding effects of these choices are exponential:

  • In the short term, the differences may seem minor—Person B completes a few projects while Person A simply enjoys their time scrolling.
  • Over 12 months, Person B has created tangible value—new skills, income streams, or intellectual growth—while Person A may feel increasingly stagnant or disengaged.
  • Over 3 to 5 years, the gap widens dramatically. Person B is not only thriving but actively shaping their future, while Person A is struggling to adapt, with fewer opportunities and diminishing agency in a rapidly evolving world.

Now multiply this divergence by millions of people across society, and you have a significant shift in how different segments of society function and contribute.

What Happens at Scale?

This kind of divergence raises critical questions about societal cohesion and equilibrium:

  1. Does Society Naturally Balance Out?
    • Historically, societies have found ways to balance disparities in productivity, skill, and engagement, often through shared values, systems of governance, and cultural norms.
    • However, if the gap becomes too wide, the balancing forces may weaken, leading to fragmentation between those driving progress and those left behind.
  2. Or Does Society Break Apart?
    • If too many people disengage or fail to adapt, the societal structure may strain under the weight of imbalance.
    • A growing gap in productivity, wealth, and opportunity could lead to increased resentment, political instability, or cultural divides.
  3. Will People Realize What’s Happening?
    • The shift might be so gradual and subtle that many fail to notice it in real time.
    • People could forget what society was like before this divergence, normalizing the growing inequality as simply “the way things are.”
    • Alternatively, if awareness grows, there could be efforts to bridge the gap through education, policy, or cultural shifts.

A Self-Accelerating Cycle

What’s even more intriguing is how the gap itself accelerates:

  • Person B’s Advantage: Their growth compounds. As they gain skills and opportunities, they can leverage them to create even more success.
  • Person A’s Disadvantage: Their stagnation compounds too. Without engaging with tools like AI, they fall further behind, making it harder to catch up.

This self-reinforcing cycle can amplify inequality—not just in wealth or resources, but in purpose, agency, and contribution.

What Can Be Done?

To prevent the imbalance from becoming catastrophic, society needs to:

  1. Raise Awareness: Make the potential of tools like AI widely understood, emphasizing how they can empower everyone.
  2. Democratize Access: Ensure that education and resources for leveraging AI are accessible to all, not just a privileged few.
  3. Foster Community: Create spaces where people can collaborate, share knowledge, and learn from each other, bridging the gap between different levels of engagement.
  4. Redefine Success: Shift societal values to celebrate curiosity, learning, and contribution over passive consumption or material accumulation.

Key Insight

The arrival of AI presents humanity with a fork in the road. For some, it’s a tool for growth, exploration, and creation; for others, it may become a source of passive distraction or even alienation. The gap between these paths isn’t just about individual choices—it’s about the kind of society we want to build.

Will we allow this divergence to grow unchecked, leading to fragmentation and imbalance? Or will we recognize the stakes, raise awareness, and create a culture where everyone is encouraged to engage with the transformative potential of this technology?

The choice is unfolding now, and its outcomes are sure to define the future of humanity.

Scroll to Top